Britain’s MI6 intelligence chief says AI won’t replace need for human spies

The Oxbridge types have got to keep themselves relevant, right?

I honestly question the people that thought that it would. Everything will be open on the internet, including Putin's lunch?

Britain’s MI6 intelligence chief says AI won’t replace need for human spies

From a man that has literally no knowledge or detailed and technical understanding of AI

How AI is revolutionizing how governments conduct surveillance

https://www.npr.org/2023/06/13/1181868277/how-ai-is-revolutionizing-how-governments-conduct-surveillance

Richard Moore is a career diplomat, he sits in a chair and take instructions , does what he is told.

Only a fool would make such a statement.

Cameras are the legs on the ground add AI is a unrelenting force to search databases at the blink of an eye .

The future could mean AI fortified assisted drones do the business.

Richard Moore is highly respected and knows the secrets of the country. His knowledge is both deep and wide. He is the only named person in MI6. Born in Libya. AI will become an important part of the agency.

I prefer my honeypots to be flesh and blood, not virtual.

If by AI he means actual, non-human intelligence, then no, it wouldn't replace human spies feeding agencies exactly what they have requested (like WMDs in Iraq).

On the other hand, if by AI he means the artificial stupid chatbots like ChatGBT etc, then, yes, they'll definitely be able to replace human spies. (Just see the lawyer who presented the precedences that one of them fed him, only to find they weren't real)

RichardPearceToday 03:35 am JST

If by AI he means actual, non-human intelligence, then no, it wouldn't replace human spies feeding agencies exactly what they have requested (like WMDs in Iraq).

Curveball was not a spy, he was a defector, and turned out to be a liar as well.

If AI won't replace human spies, won't it replace man-operated weapons in a future war? In other words, future wars will be fought only between AI-operated weapons, necessitating large contingents of human army to be superfluous.

If so, keeping high-cost military bases on foreign land will become unnecessary and meaningless.

I am sure Richard Moore is respected, that is not what I am questioning wallace.

AI won’t replace need for human spies

This statement is bordering on luddite nonsense.

I have teams appraising the advantages, principles, algorithms for turning data into effective automated predictions.

AI will advance this process, machine learning never sleeps.

The question advanced developers suggest is when AI could become sentient conscious aware

AI will become a part of the spy game but won't replace the human ones.

James and Jenny Bonds will still be needed.

Next Gen Ai facial recognition tech will render 007 a target on his so called license to kill.

Even commercially an example is Clearview AI, a revolutionary, all-in-one, facial recognition platform.

PimEyes uses face recognition search technologies to perform a reverse image search.

I honesty don't know why such Richard Moore a respected diplomat made such a statement.

Google AI are investing billions of there life saving into the technology.

https://ai.google/

The data reach, research is astonishing, that is before Microsoft and Facebook.

Everything Everywhere All at Once

Just a film, or is it?