The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOFukushima fishermen still oppose water release after IAEA report
FUKUSHIMA©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
17 Comments
Login to comment
Sanjinosebleed
How dare they after all the rubber stamp work that has been done!....
Yubaru
The government is seeking their understanding as it aims to start releasing the water around this summer.
Seems to me the government hasn't paid them enough money to agree! It is not unheard of for the government to give "incentives" to fishermen and others, to get them to (cough, cough) agree to government plans that may be publicly unpopular
gogogo
Everyone still opposes it, no one wants it, TEPCO should be made to store it and pay for it, not the entire world.
Peter Neil
Only five countries still have a ban on fish imported from Japan:
South Korea, Hong Kong, China Taiwan and Macau.
Roy Sophveason
Here's what will happen: "Local fishing groups" will very publicly hold out until the last moment and then begrudingly give their consent while still saying they would really prefer them not to release the waste water. And they will quietly cash in their government subsidy checks.
They are not stupid. They know full well that, as bad as the reputational fallout is now, if they were the ones to block the release and an acccident were to happen later they would be completely done.
Why am I confident in saying that? Because that's exactly what happened before in 2014:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-fukushima-fishermen/fukushima-fishermen-approve-plan-to-release-groundwater-from-plant-idUSBREA2O06T20140325
Eastman
it will be interesting to know how many from them have voted for LDP all of their life?
Anicerainbow
Maybe Tepco should a build a storage tank in the fisherman's backyard. I wonder how the fisherman feel than?
theFu
Actually, I expect all fishermen to be against any human-cased changes at all. Make sense. They have a routine and don't want that disrupted.
Larr Flint
Stop radioactive water release before it will be too late for the environment and people!
Roy Sophveason
Which one? All of them?
Zoroto
Don't tell me the impartial and this not-at-all-corrupt NGO didn't convince the people whose livelihood depend on the sea that it was safe to release the water....
Roy Sophveason
Which one? All of them?
elephant200
These are the good Japanese, you guys should step up the protesting of the arrogance LDP. Let every Japanese people know the corrupted LEO is possessing a very dangrous environment threat to neighbours!
Rodney
I will go there soon and take gifts them.
Desert Tortoise
Tritium is naturally occurring in the air and water. It is formed by a reaction with cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere. Bodies of water including oceans absorb it from the atmosphere. The amount of tritium to be released from Fukushima is vanishingly small in proportion to the amount of tritium that occurs in the ocean naturally.
There is no proven reliable way to remove tritium from waste water. There are some ideas but nothing yet that is proven effective. As a result every nuclear reactor disposes of their tritium contaminated water by dilution in a local body of water be it a river, lake or ocean.
The reactions to this are emotional and not rational.