tech

Musk's social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site's hate speech

9 Comments
By DAVID KLEPPER

X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, has sued a group of researchers — alleging their work highlighting an increase in hate speech on the platform cost the company millions of dollars of advertising revenue.

The suit, filed late Monday night in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, accuses the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate of violating X's terms of service by improperly collecting a vast amount of data for its analysis. The suit also alleges, without offering evidence, that the organization is funded by foreign governments and media companies who view X as competition.

The legal fight between the tech company, which was acquired by Elon Musk last year, and the center could have significant implications for a growing number of researchers and advocacy groups that seek to help the public understand how social media is shaping society and culture.

With offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom, the center regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism and harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing an increase in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.

In its lawsuit, X alleges the center violated its terms of service by automatically scraping large amounts of data from the site without the company's permission. X also claims the center improperly accessed internal Twitter data, using log-on credentials it obtained from an employee at a separate company that has a business relationship with X.

Without naming any individuals or companies, the suit says the center receives funding from foreign governments as well as organizations with ties to “legacy media organizations” that see X as a rival.

The suit claims the center's work has cost X tens of millions of dollars in lost ad revenue.

In response to the legal action, Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, defended its work and accused Musk of using the lawsuit to silence criticism of his leadership, as well as research into the role X plays in spreading misinformation and hate speech.

“Musk is trying to ‘shoot the messenger’ who highlights the toxic content on his platform rather than deal with the toxic environment he’s created," Ahmed said.

The center’s 2021 tax forms show it took in $1.4 million in revenue. A review of major donors shows several large charities, including the National Philanthropic Trust in the U.S. and the Oak Foundation and Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust in the U.K.

A spokesman for the group said the center receives no funding from any government entities or tech companies that could be considered competitors to X. The identities of other donors is not revealed in public documents, and the center declined to provide a list.

Musk is a self-professed free speech absolutist who has welcomed back white supremacists and election deniers to the platform, which he renamed X last month. He initially had promised that he would allow any speech on his platform that wasn’t illegal. “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” Musk wrote in a tweet last year.

Nevertheless, the billionaire has at times proven sensitive about critical speech directed at him or his companies. Last year, he suspended the accounts of several journalists who covered his takeover of Twitter.

__

Associated Press writer Thalia Beatty contributed to this report.

© Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.


9 Comments
Login to comment

Elon Musk is a free speech phony, free speech for me but not for thee better describes it.

11 ( +11 / -0 )

The legal fight between the tech company, which was acquired by Elon Musk last year, and the center could have significant implications for a growing number of researchers and advocacy groups that seek to help the public understand how social media is shaping society and culture.

Not the first time Musk has had a contentious relationship with scientific evidence and data based research findings.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

Seriously this guy needs to be humbled.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Oh so another far-left progressive non-profit that wants to silence the opinions of those they disagree with, there is no such thing as hate speech it’s only speech the left hates that counters their propaganda narratives

Elon will win like he always does

-11 ( +1 / -12 )

The hypocrisy of this suit.

Now there is verifiable scientific evidence proving that Musk, the man of science, is wrong! That has to hurt Elon and his cultists' fragile egos!

Researchers have proven the opinion that some of us on JT has had about Elon Musk all along. They proved that he is a hypocritical narcissist who is also an incompetent business leader.

His success came from the conning of gullible people with money and a trust fund founded on the exploitation of Blacks in South Africa!

Maybe, they should have posted their findings on 'X,' so Musk would have labeled it free speech and not sued, right!

8 ( +9 / -1 )

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” Musk wrote in a tweet last year.

That didn’t age well.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

Pot calling the kettle black. He restored the account of Diaper Donald Mussolini and that cost him. Now all he's doing is wailing like a banshee and being a crybaby because he's been losing money bigtime. People have left in droves.

Muskrat, you did this to yourself. You asked for it, you got it - Toyota. So you'd better SHUT IT UP.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Musk is becoming more and more like Trump. True reports about any company are valid. It is possible to sue over untrue statements which harm the brand, but clearly proving that harm is difficult, just like proving libel is difficult against a public figure. If the reports are published on a platform that Musk doesn't control, they can say nearly anything. Heck, I use nearlyfreespeech.net for that sort of stuff. Unless they get a court order, the site stays up. Period. Plus, they are cheap - less than $10/yr most of the time. They mostly charge for bandwidth used and most small sites would use less than $0.50/month.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The free speech absolutist, is suing someone for saying something he didn't like.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites