Here
and
Now

kuchikomi

Success in life depends on how we use words

21 Comments
By Michael Hoffman

Humans are word animals. Words to us are what grunts, roars, barks, chirps, twitters, tweets and squeals are to the beasts. We have silence too, but prefer words. We use them to inform, persuade, sell, flatter, flummox, fool, seduce, deceive, cajole, lead, mislead, stir love, stir hate – or none of the above, simply to pass the time of day, using words to say nothing; the closer they approach nothingness the deeper the innocent pleasure they bring, the warmer the closeness they foster.

What we can’t do by main strength we do with words, and the farther civilization advances, the more territory strength yields to words. Success in life depends on using them wisely, says the business magazine President (July 14). Can it teach us how? It gets A for effort, mustering the knowledge and skills of word coaches, communication strategists, media mavens, public relations specialists and so on.

Such arcane expertise for so simple a function. Maybe it’s not simple after all. Uncoached, unpolished, raw, untutored, can we really be trusted with the great gift of words that nature has conferred upon us?

Two world leaders now locked in deadly combat are a study in communication contrast. Ukraine President Volodymir Zelenskyy: earnest, informal, engaging, sincere, inspiring; Russian President Vladimir Putin: stiff, cold, formal, obdurate, dogged, overbearing. Which of the two would you want for a boss? The significance of the question lies in this, suggests communication researcher Junko Okamoto: the age of “top-down” governance, national or corporate, is over. Putin is pure top-down. He rules, his underlings say “Yes, sir!” Zelenskyy wants ideas, not obedience; and he gets them because he stimulates where Putin oppresses; his staff respond by thinking, not by submitting.

 Corporate managers, take note – of Zelenskyy prevailing against crushing odds, Putin floundering in a deepening morass.

As with nations, so in business – the bullying boss is obeyed but there’s no soul in obedience. No soul, no inspiration; no inspiration, no payoff.

Wielders of power, national or corporate, are commanding figures with strong personalities. They wouldn’t be where they are otherwise. They don’t suffer fools gladly. Patience is a virtue no doubt but an unaffordable luxury in tense situations – so they would say, partly in self-justification, being no strangers to flashes of anger.

Dampen it, counsels publisher and editor Yutaka Fujiyoshi. Be not angry. At least, show no anger. Other matters aside, you risk crossing that fine line between firm management and power harassment, an ancient vice but a modern issue, disconcerting to old-style managers who take power for granted and the exercise of it as their due. Respect for human dignity? Humanity doesn’t confer dignity, only the potential for it; nor does it confer power – again, only the potential for it, potential that must be honed in the fires of submission. Thus  speaks  old-style management; Putin-style management. Ethics aside, says Fujiyoshi, it no longer works.

What does? Patience, understanding, more listening and less ranting, more “How do you young junior employees think we should proceed?” and less “This is how we’ll proceed, underlings; do what I tell you or risk my displeasure!”

An interesting implication arising from all this is that an evolution well underway elsewhere in the world – from top-down to partnership – has yet to take root in hierarchical Japan. Relevant, perhaps, in that connection is a recent survey by Japan’s Persol Research Institute. The question posed, to roughly 1000 individuals in each of 18 countries and regions, is, “Do you derive satisfaction from work?” First place went to India, 92.6 percent answering yes. Second place: Indonesia – 90.6. Third: the Philippines – 90.1. Fourth: China – 89.2. England, France, the U.S. – all in the 70s. Japan? In 18th and last place – 49.1 percent.

Speaking, listening, communicating – the fact is, we all have much to learn. Investigative journalist Fumiaki Tada, in his contribution to President’s package, shows himself willing to learn from some rather unsavory characters. They’ve made much news lately – the slick perpetrators of the famous ore-ore scam and its various, increasingly (sometimes astonishingly) sophisticated offshoots. “Ore-ore” is a very informal way of saying, “It’s me, it’s me.” In its most basic guise, fraudster phones target, usually an elderly person, and launches a spiel: “It’s me, it’s me” – implying someone the caller knows well, a son, a grandson. “Eh? Takeshi?” “Yeah. Listen, I’m in trouble, this happened to me, that happened to me, I need money, help me, grandma, my life is in your hands, here’s how to transfer money to my account, please, grandma, don’t fail me!” – and so on.

That’s how it started, primitive embryo of the far more elaborate plots being spun these days – individuals merging into groups, crude story lines growing into productions worthy of genuine theater, the dazed targets bamboozled by fake police officers, municipal officials, bank officials, what have you. Repeated warnings by real police, municipal and bank officers have failed to stem a steady rise in the number of victims – who wake up at last, too late, from the spell cast on them to find they’ve turned over vast sums of money to people who are unlikely ever to be heard of again.

Tada can’t help marveling at their skill. Their research is thorough, their talk clear and focused, their listening intense, their manner bright, positive, engaging. Business people can channel these same virtues towards worthier ends.

Tada learns, too, from the ancients. He recalls a scammer scamming him – not knowing he was a journalist – with the line, “There are three points I would like you to appreciate.” Click! “Three – the magic number three!” Craft your business proposals and presentations accordingly, he advises. What’s magic about three? Hard to say. It goes way back. The ancient Greeks thought three was the perfect number, the number of harmony, wisdom and understanding. Other examples are familiar to everyone: “Friends, Romans, countrymen”; “of the people, by the people, for the people”; “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Yes, there are tricks to using words…

Michael Hoffman is the author of “Arimasen.” 

© Japan Today

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.

21 Comments
Login to comment

YES!

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

This author certainly uses a lot of them.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Zelenskyy wants ideas, not obedience

I'm not sure how much the writer knows about Ukraine, but this is the man who has literally banned opposition parties and suspended elections.

2 ( +8 / -6 )

As a retired ad exec and long-time writer, I'll go with the title. And as a regular reader and occasional participant in JT's comments threads, I'm fully aware - and often appalled - at the inability, or just plain ignorance, of other contributors who can't or won't structure their submissions with appropriate words. Sometimes I think people should stop using their thumbs on tiny hand-held devices and either learn to type or actually write with a pen and paper.

10 ( +10 / -0 )

It is true, the winner is the one who is able to tell the best, most convincing story. To be a good story teller you have to be a master of the words.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

One should listen, not only to coworkers, but to customers. The bigger a company gets, the harder it becomes for management to hear what customers have to say. Conversing with employees can get one only so far, when they are constrained from taking any initiative.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Ukraine President Volodymir Zelenskyy: earnest, informal, engaging, sincere, inspiring; Russian President Vladimir Putin: stiff, cold, formal, obdurate, dogged, overbearing.

Huh? Couldn't read beyond this point. Utter rubbish.

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

Words alone will not provide wealth, or social status, or grant all your hearts desires either in business or in life.

To listen is to learn, to pay thoughtful attention, to eavesdrop.

Trust me its has taken thirty old years to figure that one out.

Interesting article

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Skill in oratory and rhetoric used to be expected of political leaders. But Trump, who stumbles unintelligibly through every sentence he attempts in his native language like a five year old with issues, made it to president. Decline and Fall.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

I'm not sure how much the writer knows about Ukraine, 

I’m sure he knows, as we all do,, that Ukraine was attacked without provocation by a wannabe tzar who knew so little about Ukraine he thought he could take the whole country in a matter of days. The tzar obviously didn’t know much about Ukraine.

this is the man who has literally banned opposition parties and suspended elections.

You’re surely referring to Putin: the man (for want of a better word) who poisons the opposition and when they refuse to die, throws them in prison on trumped up charges or encourages them to jump out of a high window: who has his state goons beat up and imprison those who call a war a war, or who dare express opposition to his war: who holds ‘referenda’ after expelling the majority of the legitimate population, and requires those remaining to vote with armed troops watching over them.

The man who literally invaded a sovereign neighbour, who sent criminals from his prisons to loot, rape and slaughter innocent people, who blew up a dam endangering the lives of thousands, who has mined a major nuclear power plant, is withdrawing troops and plant personnel from the area and ordering those remaining to claim Ukraine dunnit when an ‘emergency situation’ occurs.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

I read this and suddenly found myself craving waffles.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Words have little meaning unless backed up with substance and purpose.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

I'm all for eloquence. The "Ukraine" reference strikes me as forced, superficial, and probably incorrect. Zelensky's country is being destroyed, hardly a sign of "success", Insert any of the fine quotes about war being the ultimate human failure. I agree with most of the other arguments though.

My own impression is that Japanese people love lists of three, named "dai-san" in Japanese. So you have the three best views, the three best Japanese gardens, the three holy mountains, and so on. When I see children doing English speech contests, the titles are often along the lines of "three things I'll do in summer". Notwithstanding Bob from Schoolhouse Rock and De La Soul who sampled him, I'm not sure three globally is a magic number. You cannot simply project a Japanese prelidiction (my difficult word of the day) for threes onto the rest of the world.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

I think the difficulty is striking a balance. A large part of Trump's popularity probably stems from his incredibly limited monosyllabic vocabulary. It appeals to those suspicious of the educated.

On the other hand, Boris Jonson was unable to tone down his use of language that could only come from literary academia. It appeals to people who think long words equals intelligence.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Not a single mention of Shakespeare or Churchill. Shakespeare used more than 20,000 words in his plays and poems, and his works provide the first recorded use of over 1,700 words in English. Churchill has a vocabulary of 60,000 words.

There are 500,000 words in English. 50 words make up 45% of all English words.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

My favorite is the English poet, John Cooper Clarke from Salford in Manchester. The  'Bard of Salford'.

His most famous is

I Wanna Be Yours

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/mar/20/john-cooper-clarke-arctic-monkeys-worlds-favourite-poem-i-wanna-be-yours-ford-cortina

Top 10 John Cooper Clarke Poems

https://louderthanwar.com/top-10-john-cooper-clarke-poems/

I watched his performances several times.

Another one was Ian Dury who passed away in 2000.

So many more like the Beatles.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

@Wallace.

Dr.Cooper Clarke!

John Shuttleworth also!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Yes, Dr. Cooper Clarke but not a title he really used in a recent TV interview on the BBC Hardtalk. It was an Honorary doctorate from the University of Salford, in 2013.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

John Shuttleworth

New to me.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

These days, listening to an audiobook of Moby DIck. EVERY sentence is carefully crafted and full of word play. I recommend it to all who want to elevate their English discourse.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

To be fair, Putin isn't known for his eloquence in public speaking. Zelenskyy on the other hand has continuously inspired the frontline troops, you can tell by the looks on their tired faces.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites