Cards fan comments

The Dems as well, if you go by that premise.

lol No. Donald got indicted, not the "dems."

You can sit on the top of the hill and scream that all day, you will never, ever convince half of the country that,

The fact that a lot of stupid Trump supporters think something is true, doesn't make it true.

Which constitutionally he is legal to ask especially with such a razor margin.

lol You don't have a constitutional right to commit fraud.

From one charge to another so suspect can serve longer detention, typical Japan. It can be used for not only for real criminal but also innocent person.

Considering the man's head was found in their home, I'd say it's a safe bet they're not innocent.

trying to jail a political rival by using the “Justice” system to protect the regime in power.

The regime in power. Lol this is delusional. You have no proof Biden has had any role in any of this, and again just proves my point: any attempt at holding Trump accountable is corrupt.

of course recusal won’t happen. Doesn’t mean it’s right or that the replacement wouldn’t have the same bias.

This is precisely what I mean. There's no winning with rightists. They're deaf to logic, and blind to truth. When the facts don't comport to their feelings, they'll quickly abandon all facts.

Unlawful retaliation from the bench in response to feee speech. 

Lol there's nothing unlawful about instructing parties not to engage in inflammatory speech pretrial. She was very clear on this.

Chutkan said that if anyone makes “inflammatory” statements about the case, she would be inclined to move more quickly to trial to prevent any intimidation of witnesses or contamination of the jury pool.

Judge: don’t speak publicly to inform the people of my bias and conflicts of interests.

That's not what the judge said.

doesnt sound lawful to prevent that speech. Cause for recusal.

Wrong. Witness tampering and intimidation is illegal. Telling Trump not to discuss the case publicly isn't.

All in all, this was very stupid, and further illustrates how impulsive Trump is. Now the judge is probably going to move the case up.

Makes sense to me to speak out about bias

Of course it makes sense to violate the Judge's orders. Of course it does. Lol

They erected a 7m tall statue to stepan bandera - known collaborator and mass murderer in Lviv.

Yes, I'm sure the folks at Rusich and Wagner group are very concerned about rightwing extremism. lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rusich_Group

Yes. Saving precious life in the Donbass which has bled shamelessly under bandera nationalist assault since 2014 is imperative

Thank Russia for the tanks and troops they supplied back then.

https://www.vox.com/2014/9/3/18088560/ukraine-everything-you-need-to-know

They care so deeply about people dying there, they supplied weapons to kill. Disgusting.

Will you be as vocal when France invaded Niger to secure it's uranium supply?

Not going to happen, but sure. Will you be just as vocal when Russia invades Ukraine? Oh, wait...

Again, does anything you've mentioned justify Russia invading?

As in Ukraine they ban all men 18 to 60 from leaving and plenty of videos of Ukrainian press gangs forcing men into "recruitment vans" including those exempt from military duty under the law!

Does that justify Russia invading?

They swallow all USA/EU/UK/Ukraine narratives even when it makes zero sense.

Does any of this justify Russia invading? Just answer, it's easy.

Go to YouTube, or wherever you want, you will find plenty of videos of Russians in Russia giving their opinion on the war pro and against,

Hot garbage. Now you're claiming Russia is freer then Ukraine? Absurd.

What double talk, you say no ban but then justify banning parties.

Yeah, parties loyal to the country currently invading them probably shouldn't be allowed to exist.

Crazy, huh?

Here is and interesting thing for you to try.

I don't care. How does anything you mention justify the Russian invasion? It's a simple question.

What do you call an armed overthrow of and elected government,

That didn't happen.

the arrest of all opposition, banning of political parties and independent news?

Not arrest. lol Political parties aren't banned. Pro-Russian ones were following the invasion.

But again, what does any of this have to do with Russia's warmongering? Do you think it justifies invading?

Well the coup in Ukraine for starters!

There was no coup for starters.

And even if there were, what does that have to do with Russian warmongering?

What, does Russia get to go invade countries and install puppet leadership if they don't like the leadership?

I guess Ukrainians don't get to be a free, self-governing country.

But what country has been at war most of its existence, promoted more coup d'etat than any other installing mostly right wing governments/ dictators? Well take away the R, I , and one S and there is the answer.

What's the US got to do with Russia's warmongering?

Here are the heroes of today's Ukraine.

This is nothing new, my non-partisan friend. I'm really bored of your repetitive pablum. Does any of this justify invading and ill gally annexing Ukrainian land? Does it justify the ethnic cleansing Russia is now involved in?

Yes it might.

Well it's not true, and no, it wouldn't justify invading. Thank you for again showing how you're pro-invasion. I appreciate the candor.

They literally still have a battalion of Nazis.

Not true. Even if it did, does it justify Russia invading Ukraine?

Will become? Are you sure?

Quite.

prove it!

I will when you learn what an opinion is.

you’ve never done that to any of my comments. 

Oh yes, I have. Here, I'll do it again:

https://japantoday.com/category/world/russia-launches-intense-night-attacks-across-ukraine-targeting-southern-port-city-for-second-night

But that ruins you fake stuff doesn't it?

Not fake. You've repeatedly compared Ukraine to Nazis. You repeatedly advocate for positions which would be disadvantageous for Ukraine, and advantageous to Russia. It doesn't take an "imagination" as you put it.

Why shouldn't I criticize Ukraine.

Ah yes, your non-partisanship is showing yet again. Why shouldn't you criticize Ukraine? I don't know, because they're the ones defending themselves from Russia's imperialist invasion?

So if you and others stop pretending Ukraine is free and democratic then I have no reason to point out it isn't.

I'll stop when you stop defending the Russian invasion. It's pathetic, and if you actually cared about democracy, as you claim, you'd be all for the west assisting the Ukraine, because the west is far, far more democratic than Russia or any of it's third-world vassal states, and Ukraine too, will become far freer once unshackled from the chains of Russian tyranny.

Why not ignore it?

Great question, Antique, back at you. Why not ignore it?

nope! Prove it!

No, no, when you assert something isn't true, it's on you to prove it. There are articles here on the Russian attacks, and you even commented.

What is pathetic is you not reading even what you quoted!

Oh wow, "neither Ukraine nor Russia are democracies" wow, so tough on Russia for invading. Give me a break. Quite literally each and every post you make on the invasion is a criticism of Ukraine and or the US.

It’s cute that the “no” and “prove it” people just expect us to automatically accept this happened in the way the media and Ukraine conveniently claim.

It's cute you choose to ignore article after article that shows how Russia deliberately went after grain and the infrastructure required to ship the grain. If you think the articles are wrong the onus is on you to prove it.

There is no democracy in Ukraine or Russia

And yet you'll criticize only Ukraine. Pathetic.