health

U.S. preterm birth and maternal mortality rates are alarmingly high, outpacing those in all other high-income countries

19 Comments
By Sonia Hassan and Hala Ouweini, Wayne State University

Every two minutes, in about the time it takes to read a page of your favorite book or brew a cup of coffee, a woman dies during pregnancy or childbirth, according to a February 2023 report from the World Health Organization. The report reflects a shameful reality in which maternal deaths have either increased or plateaued worldwide between 2016 and 2020.

On top of that, of every 10 babies born, one is preterm – and every 40 seconds, one of those babies dies. Globally, preterm birth is the leading cause of death in children under the age of 5, with complications from preterm birth resulting in the death of 1 million children under age 5 each year.

The WHO has designated preterm birth an “urgent public health issue” in recognition of the threat it poses to global health.

Those numbers reflect a worldwide problem, but the U.S. in particular has an abysmal record on both preterm births and maternal mortality: Despite significant medical advancements in recent years, the U.S. suffers from the highest maternal mortality rate among high-income countries globally. And the 2022 March of Dimes Report Card, an evaluation of maternal and infant health, gave the United States an extremely poor “D+” grade. That data also revealed that the national preterm birth rate spiked to 10.5% in 2021, representing a record 15-year high.

We are maternal fetal medicine experts and scholars of women’s health who focus on treatments and programs to help women have better maternal health, especially those that reduce preterm birth.

Our Office of Women’s Health leads the SOS Maternity Network, which stands for the Synergy of Scholars in Maternal and Infant Health Equity, a research alliance of maternal fetal medicine physicians across the state of Michigan.

Maternal and infant death are the worst possible outcomes of pregnancy. These numbers make clear just how crucial it is to change this trajectory and to ensure all Americans have practical access to quality reproductive health care.

Dire state of maternal health care

Tori Bowie, an elite Olympic athlete, tragically lost her life at just age 32 because of complications of pregnancy and childbirth.

Bowie’s story drives home the devastating state of maternal health in the U.S. Maternal mortality is a sad and unexpected ending to the often beautiful journey of pregnancy and childbirth. It means that a baby has to go without its mother’s love, care and comforting touch and at the same time the family has to mourn the sudden loss of their loved one. Unless substantial progress is made for lowering maternal deaths, the lives of over 1 million more women like Bowie could be at risk by the year 2030, if current trends continue.

Unfortunately, the maternal and infant health crises are worsening in the U.S., and this association is far from being an unfortunate coincidence. There is an important link between infant health and maternal health, as they both rely on the accessibility and quality of health care. These U.S. rates have been increasing since 2018, when improved reporting of maternal deaths was adopted.

In 2020, the U.S. maternal mortality rate was 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births – nearly three times as high as the country with the next-highest rate of 8.7 deaths per 100,000 live births, France.

The number of women who died within a year after pregnancy more than doubled in the U.S. over the 20-year period of 1999 to 2019. And there are significant racial disparities in this statistic: The highest number of pregnancy-related deaths were recorded among Black women, increasing from 26.7 per 100,000 births to 55.4 per 100,000 during that same time period.

Worse yet, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has determined that about 84% of such maternal deaths are preventable.

Tragic rates of infant mortality and preterm birth

Notably, in 2020 the U.S. also experienced the highest infant mortality rate of all high-income countries. The U.S infant mortality rate was 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, in contrast to the 1.6 deaths per 1,000 live births in Norway, the country with the lowest infant mortality rate.

You may have heard the term “preemie” before, perhaps when a loved one delivered a baby more than three weeks before the expected due date. A premature birth is one that occurs before the 37th week of pregnancy. Preterm-related causes are responsible for 35.8% of infant deaths in the U.S.

Preterm babies are often not fully physiologically prepared for delivery, which can result in a range of medical complications. While preterm births lead to rising infant mortality rates, even those who survive can face health problems such as breathing difficulties, problems with feeding, significant developmental delay and more throughout their lives. Preterm birth also presents additional risks for the mother, as women who deliver preterm are at higher risk for cardiovascular complications later in life.

Thus, preterm birth takes a significant toll on families and their communities, with serious ramifications in medical, social, psychological and financial contexts.

Maternal care during pregnancy is key

Maternal care appointments and screenings are essential to prevent prenatal complications and a women’s increased risk for developing long-term complications such as cardiovascular disease. For that reason, patients should secure prenatal care as early as possible in the pregnancy and continue to regularly have prenatal care appointments.

Preterm birth can occur unexpectedly in an otherwise normal-seeming pregnancy. It looks no different from the early signs of a typical labor, except that it occurs before 37 weeks of pregnancy. The symptoms of premature labor can include contractions, unusual vaginal discharge, the feeling of pressure in the pelvic area, low dull backache or cramps in the uterus or abdomen. A person who experiences these symptoms during pregnancy should seek medical attention.

Some people are more predisposed to preterm birth based on individual risk factors like substance use, multiple pregnancy – such as twins – infections, race, a medical history of prior preterm delivery and heightened stress levels. Our research team and others have shown that COVID-19 is a known risk factor for preterm birth.

It’s important to speak with your primary care provider to assess how your current health may affect future pregnancy and whether lifestyle changes – such as adopting a healthy diet and active lifestyle and avoiding smoking and drinking alcohol – can improve your likelihood of a full-term delivery.

Preterm birth prevention

The more that pregnant women take ownership of their health and ask their doctors to perform a simple cervical length screening during their pregnancy, the earlier preterm birth can be detected and prevented and the more lives will be saved.

Evidence has shown that patients with a short cervix face a greater risk of the cervix’s opening too early in pregnancy, resulting in preterm birth and other adverse outcomes. The cervix is the lower section of the uterus, which connects to the vaginal canal. As pregnancy progresses, it stretches, softens and ultimately opens in the process of normal childbirth.

All patients – even those who are seemingly low risk – should ask their doctors to have their cervical length checked by transvaginal ultrasound during pregnancy between 19 and 24 weeks. A short cervical length indicates a high risk of a premature delivery. Luckily, there are treatments available, such as vaginal progesterone, which can prevent preterm birth in women found by ultrasound to have a short cervix. This treatment can reduce the risk of preterm birth by more than 40%.

We are optimistic that with greater awareness of these issues and a shift in the focus to evidence-based practices coupled with increased access to vulnerable populations, the U.S. can begin to give women like Bowie and so many others the health care they and their infants deserve.

The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

© The Conversation

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.

19 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Yeah, yeah. How much of that is due to obesity? Won't stop some commentators from calling the US third world, though.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Won't stop some commentators from calling the US third world, though.

Being unable to put forward a consistent and effective public health campaign to reduce maternal mortality and preterm birth can validly be considered a parameter where the US is closer to the developing world than a high income country, If obesity is part of the causes that would not excuse this only explain how this regression towards less development is taking place.

Of course the article makes a very good point explaining how this is in great part explained by lack of proper access to health care for some populations at high risk, Obesity is not one of these factors but race is, something else that points to standards of care usually related to developing countries.

-1 ( +7 / -8 )

Yet when RFK Jr speaks about all the possible causes for this, he's shut down as a conspiracy kook.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Bad health care system equals bad health results. America needs to jump on the socialist medicine wagon and quit being afraid of that word.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Yet when RFK Jr speaks about all the possible causes for this, he's shut down as a conspiracy kook.

Well, when the medical professionals that know about the topic contradict something he says he keeps using a conspiracy to explain why they are all wrong and he is right. Hard not to consider someone this way when this is the only reason he gives to justify contradicting the science.

-1 ( +5 / -6 )

virusrexToday 07:24 am JST

Of course the article makes a very good point explaining how this is in great part explained by lack of proper access to health care for some populations at high risk, Obesity is not one of these factors but race is,

https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2014/06/obesity-before-pregnancy-linked-to-earliest-preterm-births--stan.html

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33093597/

0 ( +2 / -2 )

when the medical professionals that know about the topic contradict something he says

Correction: "when some medical professionals that know about the topic..."

He backs up what he says with scientific studies. Yes, they can be interpreted in different ways, but not all "medical professionals" agree on every possible thing.

But this article about birth issues states things like "Some people are more predisposed to preterm birth based on individual risk factors" which may be true, but are these the reasons why preterm births and maternal deaths have been increasing?

This article makes no mention of a wealth of external factors, such as all the toxins in the environment. MIcro-plastics, PTFEs and other "forever chemicals", air pollution, heavy metals in every form of seafood, widespread use of flame retardants, heaps of pesticides in foods like glyphosate.... the list of toxins being ingested and exposed to mothers is massive and is definitely affecting maternal and fetal health, yet once again, people here just blow him off as a conspiracy nut for simply questioning the knock-on effects of vaccines, when the overwhelming work and concerns he has is with how more attention need to be put on how we are literally poisoning ourselves in a huge variety of ways.

Seriously, why does nobody in power ever speak of environmental toxins affecting health except RFK, and instead put all the blame for bad health on "individual choices", like how this article puts the whole onus on mothers when there is negative outcome "because you didn't go to the doctor or you drank too much coffee, or smoked, or have too much stress". Ridiculous.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Seriously, why does nobody in power ever speak of environmental toxins affecting health except RFK

Because they're not delusional morons like RFK of course.

But you have to be PoI to recognize that.

-1 ( +5 / -6 )

Just realized my previous post was removed and I have no idea why. It definitely wasn’t off topic unlike this individual Strangerlands ranting about RFK for some reason

How can you contact the editor about the moderators on here? They seem a bit sensitive. I only wrote about how sad it was this is happening in the states but not surprised because of how expensive it is to see a doctor.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Because they're not delusional morons like RFK of course.

What I consider delusional would be to say its perfectly OK for a pregnant woman to eat mercury tainted halibut fried in Roundup-ready corn oil upon a scratched-up Teflon frying pan, with a side of arsenic laced rice and a big glass or PFA tap water.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Not surprising as there are different cultural elements at play here.

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

What I consider delusional would be to say its perfectly OK for a pregnant woman to eat mercury tainted halibut fried in Roundup-ready corn oil upon a scratched-up Teflon frying pan, with a side of arsenic laced rice and a big glass or PFA tap water.

You are the only one saying that, rational people understand without problem that making evident his irrational claims and how they can be disproved do not mean anything else.

-1 ( +5 / -6 )

Not surprising as there are different cultural elements at play here.

So the culture of the US is the reason it is degrading into a developing country by several indexes including maternal mortality rates?

0 ( +7 / -7 )

So the culture of the US is the reason it is degrading into a developing country by several indexes including maternal mortality rates?

A developing country is leading the world in economic output, advances medicine, and military strength among a multitude of other indexes?

Quite a fascinating personal belief to hear from a non-US citizen. Would like to be entertained by more.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

You are the only one saying that, 

Its being said through omission and willful ignorance.

You honestly think such toxins have no effect on a fetus?

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Seriously, why does nobody in power ever speak of environmental toxins affecting health except RFK

Powerful lobbyists and censorship.

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

Is any one actually surprised by the headline given the USA's health care system. If you have money or a good job with adequate insurance cover, then one will be ok. Otherwise good luck, and you will need a lot of that.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

A developing country is leading the world in economic output, advances medicine, and military strength among a multitude of other indexes?

None of those are valid excuses to be degrading into the developing country territory in many fields including the one the article is talking about. There is no way to deny the US is behind the rest of the developed world in maternal mortality rates and preterm births.

Quite a fascinating personal belief to hear from a non-US citizen. Would like to be entertained by more.

Again making baseless claims about what other commenters are or not? sorry but you have no ground to guess anybody citizenship here, so this amounts to accepting you have no argument so you have to pretend to know things you have no idea about.

Powerful lobbyists and censorship.

Not at all, no "lobby" can make scientists from all over the world produce evidence that clearly disproves his claims, false and misleading information that puts in danger the health or lives of people should be censored, it is a perfectly valid reason to do it. For example he recommends people to be infected by covid instead of vaccinating, something that has been correlated with preterm births and other problems during pregnancy.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Its being said through omission and willful ignorance.

That is still false, the argument is that the reference you are trying to use have demonstrably lied and made recommendations that the medical community of the world say are dangerous.

The rest is just making false dichotomies by pretending that anything said about your reference means promoting unhealthy things, both things are completely independent, people can recommend a healthy lifestyle AND at the same time disapprove of someone that recommend higher risks for pregnancies based only on personal beliefs.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites