Raw Beer comments

Science doesn't care about "do you agree?" . Science backs up it's claims with evidence.

Yes, very true. That's why I voted "no".

On a per capita basis, the USA easily beats the other two as the largest polluter.

Yes, and I believe the CO2 produced by the military is not included in their stats. So if you take that into account, their "lead" is even greater.

Plant trees if that's what you really want to do.

Yes, that's what they would do if their goal truly was to capture carbon.

And yet, somehow the rank and file of the Democrat Party has decided without doubt this is the most capable human being in the entirety of US who should continue to lead the country.

No, not the most capable to lead the country, but rather the most connected to further their agenda. He has so far been leading the country off a cliff...

It seems to be more transmissible than other circulating variants, likely due to a mutation in its spike protein.

If that is the case, then all the vaccines you've had up to now will be null and void!

Yes, and that mutation might have been an immune escape mutation caused by mass vaccination; see Geert van den Bosch.

"However the number of deaths fell by 57 percent"

So why is the WHO urging countries to ramp up vaccination efforts?

Exactly, makes no sense.

Even with omicron, I often mentioned that the vaccine could be considered as an ideal live attenuated vaccine as it would provide broader, more robust, and longer lasting immunity than the shots, while being less risky. This seems to be even more applicable to this new variant.

Russia attacked warehouses with grain for exports.

That's where Ukraine was keeping their weapons and foreign soldiers. It was a protected area during the grain deal. Ukraine took advantage of the grain deal to attack Russia, one reason for Russia not renewing the deal. Without the deal, these weapon depots were legit targets.

Um, the people who figured out that ivermectin WORKS are doctors who work in the field and study medicine for a living.

Yet they could not present valid data to prove it, which means they are not as professional as they wanted to present themselves.

Many of us have provided several peer-reviewed studies of the years, including RCTs that show it works. Hope you don't expect us to fish them out for you again...

Yes! Their site is very informative, with lots of recommendations for before, during, and after infection

When the information is incorrect or demonstrabily false ...

Nah, no falsehoods have been demonstrated. BTW, another thing the FLCCC makes very clear is how the large IVM studies that are funded (directly or indirectly) by pharma were clearly designed to fail.

Not even one institution of medicine or science...

You keep repeating that, not understanding or unwilling to accept that those institutions of medicine or science are captured.

But if you're genuinely curious, visit the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) to find out what doctors who actually care about patients - including those with LONG COVID - have been doing to save lives instead of pursuing wealth at power at the public's expense.

Yes! Their site is very informative, with lots of recommendations for before, during, and after infection.

But because it's off patent and huge sums of money can't be made from it, ivermectin was demonised by the jab makers and the media, etc. owned by the same conglomerates.

Indeed, as was hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and others.

Completely false, dexamethasone for example is dirt cheap and that did not stopped doctors from recognizing it was very useful to treat complications of covid, even if it could be replaced with drugs hundreds of times more expensive, this clear example proves that the conspiracy theory you believe is completely false.

Yeah, you keep bringing up dexamethasone. But it's not used to treat the infection, at the early stages. It's one among many corticosteroids that can be used to treat the after effects. It's in a completely different category.

Around 140,000 people died in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and 74,000 in Nagasaki three days later, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on the two Japanese cities days before the end of World War II.

Yeah, 100s of thousands of Japanese were killed by the US nuclear attacks, and now Japan is supporting the US in their proxy war against Russia. Japan is supporting the wrong side...

Russia can do the right thing and stop firing on grain ships and silos.

Perhaps if the Kiev regime didn't take advantage of the grain deal to attack Russia...

Anyway, prices have been increasing long before the end of the grain deal, even before Russia's SMO. Seems it started soon after Biden's inauguration...

We don't need new laws. Government involvement will just make things worse.

Will Japan tell NATO countries to stop arming Ukraine?

The concern with marijuana is that it gets you stoned.

Concern?

Anyway, I wonder if these cigarettes will become a great hit with foreign travelers, wanting to show people back home how #$%&ed Canada is.

I hope the ink they're using isn't more toxic than the tobacco.

I'm sure some Canadians will deal with this in creative ways, replacing "cigaretes" with "Trudeau", or making the entire cigarette black...

Ukraine should not have used the grain deal to attack Russia, and keep their weapons and foreign soldiers at the protected port.

Shut up America most people know that you are the major cause of conflict on this planet!

lol They're certainly not responsible for Russia invading Ukraine, though.

Even NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg admitted this war started in 2014, not 2022. And who was behind the 2014 coup? America!

If all you have is a YouTube link, you've already lost your argument.

Oh, I see you missed this part of my comment:

"After three years of my posting about large peer-reviewed studies, expert testimonies, and official government data,"

I have provided many links to them over the years. If you haven't seen them, perhaps you just don't want to see them...

Haven't the regulators seen the ever increasing reports of serious adverse effects from the mRNA shots?

Since the reports are a tiny fraction of the serious health problems from not being vaccinated this is not a reason for not approving a vaccine.

Except that that is not true. After three years of my posting about large peer-reviewed studies, expert testimonies, and official government data, perhaps a different approach is needed for those who remain unconvinced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsR6EkQWXng

Why?

Haven't the regulators seen the ever increasing reports of serious adverse effects from the mRNA shots?

The US needs to stay out of parts of the world that it has no business to be in

And I assume Russia and Iran will stay out of Syria, right?

What?!!! Russia and Iran are there at the invitation of Syria's leader. In contrast, US is illegally occupying Syria, stealing its oil....

Well Russia has likely not yet seen any evidence that the other side has any intention of satisfying their side of the deal.

It seems the deep state is very worried about the next election. They are throwing everything at Trump...

These alleged extremes in temperature are cyclic, natural, and benign in the long term.

America is used as an excuse to [get ready] for war. Yet America simply sits back and watches these countries make fools of themselves and watches them shoot themselves in the foot. I guess when you are intimidated by America, you all SH!t in your pants.

Really? America is behind most (all?) recent conflicts. What do you think cackling Hillary meant when she said "We came, we saw, he died"?

The US keeps on taking about China being a threat, as they arm Taiwan. And obedient Kishida visiting nearby countries discussing "defense". Xi saw how they started the conflict in Ukraine and he knows China might be next.

There are many theories. Some observers say he is seeking to crash the US dollar and restructure global finance. Others say he simply has no idea what he is doing.

The US dollar is crashing, without Musk's help.

Anyway, I noticed that the above article does not include anything about what Musk said about this subject; it only quotes critics. Musk did say what he's doing and why...

30 years, twice about 2 weeks apart at the same train station. When I mentioned that it was the second time within 2 weeks, he apologized and mentioned it was because of the upcoming Olympics, which were still a few (4 to 5?) years away!

No. On the contrary it’s to be welcomed because it means a greener earth and bigger crop yields

The scientific consensus is that this is false

Nah, the increase in CO2 has resulted in a greening of Earth. Many studies show that, even NASA says so.

Yet, only about 5% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is derived from human activity...

That is completely false, 5% of the produced CO2 is produced by humans...

So how is my statement completely false?

So according to you: 5% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is not derived from human activity, it is produced by humans.

They have contributed much of the man-made CO2, which is a very small fraction of the total CO2 in the atmosphere.

NASA data says CO2 in the atmosphere has increased from 280 ppm to 412ppm since the start of the industrial age (and from 370ppm since the year 2000).

Yet, only about 5% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is derived from human activity....

Air pollution is known to have severe health effects, like impairing brain activity.

Yes, good point. I'm all for doing everything we can to reduce air pollution.

I just have a problem when people call CO2 pollution.

They have contributed much of the man-made CO2, which is a very small fraction of the total CO2 in the atmosphere.

The point is that the CO2 produced by humans is what originates climate change, that is not disputed and is a well recognized fact by the scientific community (again, you have repeatedly failed to produce a reference where any recognized institution of science in any country of the world disagrees with this).

It certainly is disputed. Just because scientific associations and journals have been captured (as demonstrated by the Climategate scandal), doesn't mean we have to accept their conclusions.

The U.N. climate financing arrangement is based on the principle that rich countries have a greater responsibility to tackle climate change, because they have contributed the bulk of the CO2 emissions heating the planet since the industrial revolution.

They have contributed much of the man-made CO2, which is a very small fraction of the total CO2 in the atmosphere.

Human influence on climate is minimal, if any. Any measure that will be adopted will have no significant effect on climate, it will only transfer wealth to a select few...

I wonder how many of these drones will actually make it to Ukraine.